Skip to content
Friday, October 16, 2026
Insiktsblogg

Former Second-in-Command Dick Cheney: An Examination on the Influential Political Career

The late US vice-president Dick Cheney, who died at age 84, was considered among the most powerful incumbents of that position in American history. Whereas many VPs had to settle for marginal or symbolic functions, Cheney wielded huge sway during the term of George W Bush, to the point that he was frequently called as the "real president".

Bush objected to that description and stated the dynamic was more nuanced. He pointed out that Cheney was respectful, invariably referring to him in public as the President, while he addressed him as Dick. Bush questioned even portrayals of their relationship as a collaboration because it implied that they were equals. Regardless of these denials, Cheney considered the easygoing president accommodating on a broad range of governmental choices.

The Post-9/11 Era

Leading of a faction of neo-conservatives that encompassed military head Donald Rumsfeld and deputy defence secretary Paul Wolfowitz, he strongly advocated the military intervention of Iraq in 2003 in reaction to the September 11th attacks on New York and Washington. During of the 9/11 strike, Bush had been participating in a session at a educational institution in Florida. Whereas Bush headed for a secret bunker in Nebraska, Cheney took command, ordering the shooting down of any non-communicating aircraft nearing the government building.

Cheney claimed the strikes transformed him, making him become intent on retribution. Along with other neo-conservatives, including Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz, he advocated for a invasion of Afghanistan in an attempt to apprehend Osama bin Laden. Cheney then strongly advocated for the invasion of Iraq, though there was little proof of Saddam Hussein playing a role.

Controversial Policies

He expressed no regrets about the armed intervention, in which an estimated 100,000 Iraqis perished, or about the waterboarding of individuals captured after 9/11. He informed CNN in 2015 that the Iraq military action, which was founded on misleading reports echoed by Cheney, was the right path to take. "It was the right thing to do then. I was convinced then and I maintain that stance presently."

However even at the time, there were contrary opinions at a top tier about the botched execution of Iraq. One of the government's own representatives to the region, General Anthony Zinni (2001-03), was not retained from the post. "I observed, at a minimum," he subsequently stated "obvious failure, inaction, and recklessness: at worst, lying, ineptitude, and corruption."

Additional Factors

Cheney was not completely responsible for the Iraq military action. Even before 9/11, Wolfowitz had advocated for such action. He had written a memo setting out circumstances in which national priorities might be compromised (featuring "access to vital raw materials, mainly Persian Gulf oil"). Wolfowitz had argued that "the US should be prepared to take unilateral action when joint efforts cannot be arranged," particularly mentioning defense operations against Iraq.

Bush too had arrived in the White House somewhat determined on executing what his predecessor had specifically avoided to do in 1991; remove Saddam. Subsequent to he had been fired by the administration, the finance chief Paul O'Neill disclosed how, at the initial gathering of the National Security Council in January 2001, Bush had announced his objective of reducing America's engagement in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and mooted military action against Iraq.

Bush carried a private grievance against Saddam, thinking he had been responsible for a plot to assassinate his father, President George HW Bush, on a journey to Kuwait in 1993. He also objected to that one of the largest accommodations in Baghdad had a floor mural with a portrait of his parent's visage that everyone had to step on.

Questioning Techniques

Yet it was Cheney who was part of the most vociferous behind striking Iraq, consistently referencing information documents that were either weak or completely misleading. He supported what the Bush administration euphemistically referred to as "advanced techniques", the use of simulated drowning and physical pressure.

Addressing a Senate report in 2014 that concluded that no valuable data had come from the harsh techniques, Cheney dismissed the findings as "riddled with crap". He informed Fox News: "We instructed [the CIA] to establish protocols and establish initiatives to catch the perpetrators who killed 3,000 of us on 9/11 and ensure it was not repeated. That is precisely what they did and they merit a lot of praise."

Public Image

Cheney enjoyed labels assigned to him by opponents such as Darth Vader and the sinister presence, and by the idea that he was a sinister influence manipulating Bush. In Peter Baker's 2013 publication about the two, Days of Fire: Bush and Cheney in the White House, Cheney is quoted as saying: "Is it me who is the evil genius in the shadows that nobody ever sees emerge from his hole? That is a effective way to work, in fact."

Commercial Ties

Dispute over his commercial relationships accompanied him throughout his time as second-in-command. Although he had little experience in corporate affairs but strong connections in military, particularly in Saudi Arabia, he was offered a position at Halliburton, one of the world's largest petroleum conglomerates, in 1995 as leader and CEO.

In 2000 he was selected as Bush's VP candidate for the executive branch. Controversially, during the conflict in Iraq, Halliburton was awarded US agreements valued at substantial sums.

It made him rich. His yearly earnings during his time at the firm increased from his previous salary when he was defence secretary to millions. When he departed in 2000 he had a package worth more than $20m|twenty

By

Lauren Cole

A tech journalist and digital strategist with over a decade of experience covering emerging technologies and their impact on society.

Insiktsblogg

Type to search articles.